The Spook Light Again

Back in September, I attended the annual conference of the Missouri Writers' Guild in Columbia, where Sandy Selby, editor of Missouri Life Magazine, was one of the speakers. I talked briefly with her before her presentation, and I remarked that my very first article for Missouri Life was published many years ago, 1977 to be exact, and that it was about the Tri-State Spook Light. She said that maybe it was time for an update, but I haven't followed through on the suggestion, because I haven't decided how to approach such an article or whether I even want to try. 

My latest book, published in January of this year, was about the Spook Light (https://amzn.to/3WEygDn), and I'm not sure I have much more to say about it at this time. I guess my main hesitation is just that, as I discuss in the book, the Spook Light is no longer the attraction it once was.  

Oh, there are still a steady trickle of curiosity seekers who make their way to the out-of-the-way spot about twelve miles southwest of Joplin where the Spook Light, if conditions are right, makes its nightly appearance. Maybe half a dozen cars, give or take, might find their way to Spook Light Road on any given night, but that is nowhere near the number that used to frequent the road back in the 1970s when I first got interested in the light or even in the 1980s and early 1990s. Sometimes there would be as many as a couple of hundred cars over the course of one night, especially on weekends. 

The light lost some of its allure when both Spook Light Road and State Line Road were paved. Without looking the information up, I'd say that happened in the early nineties. About the same time, law officers, in response to complaints of rowdiness from people living in the area, started patrolling the vicinity more often. Also, Spooky Middleton, who used to run the so-called Spook Light Museum, retired about 1982 and died shortly afterwards, and no one stepped up to take his place. Because of all these factors, a trip to the Spook Light just lost a little of its rustic, magical appeal. 

I think another reason the Spook Light is not the attraction it once was is simply the fact that it's harder to see nowadays than it used to be. At least, that has been my experience. As I mention in the book, I attribute this phenomenon mainly to the fact that the trees on either side of Spook Light Road have been rather drastically cut back, thereby reducing the tunnelling effect that the V those overhanging trees used to create. Looking to the west along Spook Light Road (as almost all viewers did) was almost like looking down the sights of a gun, but that is no longer the case. Everything is more wide-open, which, I think, makes it harder to see the light or distinguish it if and when you do see it.

At any rate, I'm balking on trying to write a new article about the Spook Light, but it's still something I'm mulling over.   

The Past Two Days

Part of last week's post pertained to Missouri and Ozarks history, but some of it did not. What I want to write about this week has nothing at all to do with Ozarks or Missouri history. Instead, I want to relate a personal experience and give some thoughts and reflections on it. Sometimes, everyday life takes precedence over writing about history.  

Friday night, my wife collapsed and fell on our bathroom floor, almost completely unconscious. Fortunately, she had grabbed a towel rack when she started feeling weak and unable to stand, so that she didn't go down really hard. Also, I was nearby and helped break her fall.

I had already called an ambulance as soon as she said she was feeling bad, because it was pretty clear that this was not your normal "feeling bad" because of a headache or something minor like that. However, I called a second time after she collapsed to make sure help was on the way. 

The ambulance got here pretty quickly, although it seemed like a long time to me when I was waiting. The EMTs gave her some sort of shot that brought her around a little bit, but she was still pretty much out of it. They loaded her into a stretcher to get her out of the bathroom and down the hall, put her on a gurney, and wheeled her out to the ambulance. 

I followed the ambulance to the hospital, but I had to wait before I was allowed in to see her. The wait only added to my anxiety. I was finally told after about 15 or 20 minutes that I could go in and see her. When I did, she was beet red but awake and more lucid than she'd been after she collapsed at home. Gradually her complexion started coming back. 

At first, my wife and I thought, and the medical personnel seemed to go along with the idea (maybe just to placate us) that she had had some sort of allergic reaction. After a series of tests, however, the diagnosis was that some blood clots in her legs had gone to her lungs, which I guess is called a pulmonary embolism. 

The docs put my wife on a blood thinner, and she soon started feeling better. The doctors and nurses told us that she would likely need to be admitted for observation, however. This, mind you, was Friday night, and a room did not actually become available until early Saturday afternoon. 

By yesterday (Saturday) evening, though, she was ready to go home with a prescription for Eloquis, a blood thinner that not only prevents blood clots but also breaks up already-existing ones. 

Although it's almost needless to say, I'll say it anyway. I was very relieved when my wife of almost 52 years started feeling better and it looked like she was going to survive this medical crisis with apparently a decent outlook for no further complications. Although I've always loved Gigi, sometimes I guess it takes a crisis like this to bring that love into sharp focus and make one realize how much another person means to them. 

My Trip to Ohio

My wife and I just returned from a trip to the Columbus, Ohio, region. Any time I take a road trip across the country or even just across the state of Missouri, I am always awed by how much open land there still is in the United States. 

Our nation's population has increased by about two and a half times since I was born and more than doubled since I was a little kid. Yet, it seems to me that the amount of open land has not decreased by all that much. Indeed, some of the rural areas have actually lost population, while almost all of the country's population growth has been in the metropolitan areas. 

We traveled to Ohio by way of St. Louis and Indianapolis and came back by way of Cincinnati, Louisville, and St. Louis. Just driving across Missouri on I-44 between Joplin and St. Louis, one sees a lot of open land, but I was even more struck by the amount of open space in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Kentucky, because I've always thought of those states as at least somewhat more densely populated than Missouri. Except for when we were passing through the large cities (namely Indianapolis, Cincinnati, and Louisville) much of our trip was through farm country. There were numerous times when only about a half dozen homes were visible when I looked around in every direction, as far as the eye could see. 

We saw some interesting sights along the way. In St. Louis, we visited the Missouri Civil War Museum at Jefferson Barracks and the Missouri History Museum at Forest Park. The Garst Museum in Greenville, Ohio, was also an interesting stop. The Annie Oakley and Lowell Davis wings of that place were very interesting, especially the Annie Oakley section. The highlight of the whole trip, though, was visiting with friends. 

Ritter School Consolidation Controversy

The last couple of weeks I've written about school consolidations, and I've written about the same subject at least a time or two in the more distant past. So, while I'm far from an expert on the subject of school consolidation, I know from my limited experience and research that school consolidations were rarely accomplished without some degree of controversy or disagreement. Often, the extent of the controversy was simply that one school district, usually a smaller one being taken in by a larger one, did not favor the consolidation while the other one did. Occasionally, though, the controversy involved two larger school districts contending over which one would take in a smaller school. The consolidation of Ritter School with the Springfield (MO) School District is one example of this phenomenon.    

In the fall of 1949, a county-wide school reorganization plan under which the rural Ritter School, located between Springfield and Willard, would be taken into the Springfield district was rejected by Greene County voters. Then on October 18,1950, a group of Ritter patrons petitioned the Ritter School Board for annexation to Willard, and an election was set for November 6. On October 20, however, the county school board approved a new reorganization plan under which Ritter would be taken into Springfield. 

One of the main problems with the proposal for Ritter to consolidate with Willard was that the two districts did not join each other. But on November 2, patrons of Schuyler School District, which lay between Ritter and Willard, voted to join Willard, and Willard agreed the next day to accept Schuyler. 

On November 4, the Ritter patrons who'd gathered the first petition filed a new petition to join Willard, because the legality of the move had been questioned when the two districts did not abut each other. At the November 6 election, Ritter residents voted overwhelmingly to approve the first petition to join Willard.  

Then in January 1951, they also voted, by an even greater margin, to approve the second petition. One of the reasons Ritter residents cited for preferring to join Willard was that they did not believe in "progressive education," which they felt was taught in the Springfield schools and instead preferred the old-fashioned 3-Rs.

Later that month, patrons of Springfield and Ritter voted, by order of the county school board, on a proposal for Ritter to consolidate with Springfield. Ritter patrons voted solidly against the proposal, but, because Springfield voted in favor of it, it passed easily, since Springfield patrons greatly outnumbered Ritter patrons.

The Greene County attorney sought the opinion of the Missouri attorney general on the matter, and the state official said the Springfield annexation was legal and that Ritter belonged to Springfield. The Ritter School Board then turned its funds over to Springfield. 

Boiling mad, some Ritter patrons filed suit in circuit court to overturn the ruling. The judge's sympathies were clearly with the Ritter patrons. He said, "Here a rural school district having at most a population of only a little more than 200 qualified voters, after having twice declared its desire to be annexed to Willard, a neighboring consolidated district with adequate schools, is gobbled up by its city neighbor which has a hundred times as many voters--a rural farming community has been absorbed in a metropolitan school system where instead of managing its own school affairs, it will be hopelessly out-numbered and out-voted, where its school children may feel out of place among strangers."

However, the judge said he had to follow the law and that the annexation of Ritter into Springfield, according to the school reorganization law in Missouri, was legal and binding. 

Hickory Barren School's Consolidation with Fair Grove

Last week I wrote in general about the school consolidation movement in Missouri and more specifically about the consolidation of the Bois D'Arc and Ash Grove Schools in Greene County. Another Greene County school consolidation that I'm personally familiar with is the consolidation of the Hickory Barren School into the Fair Grove district, because I was attending Fair Grove Elementary at the time.

Greene County began a school consolidation movement at least as early as the 1940s, probably earlier, and Hickory Barren being taken in by Fair Grove was specifically discussed at least as early as 1950. At that time, the proposal was that Hickory Barren and Liberty in Greene County and New Garden, just across the line in Dallas County, would all be consolidated with Fair Grove. Taking in Hickory Barren, however, was rejected by Fair Grove patrons. (Not sure about Liberty and New Garden. They did consolidate with Fair Grove, but I'm not sure whether it was at this time.)

What to do with the Hickory Barren district was discussed for a couple of more years, before it was once again slated to be consolidated with Fair Grove if voters of both districts approved. The vote was held in the spring of 1954, and this time it passed. 

An election to select a new school board for the consolidated district was set for the summer of 1954, and a controversy arose when the names of seven women from the Hickory Barren district were placed on the ballot, apparently without their knowledge or consent. The women included Mrs. Sue Kesterson, Mrs. Mary Kesterson, Mrs. James Roberts, Mrs. Paul Stafford, Mrs. Vivian Weber, Mrs. Evelyn Israel, and Mrs. John R. Wood. Sue Kesterson told a Springfield newspaper at the time that she and the other women did not want to serve as board members and that she thought they had been nominated by "enemies of Hickory Barren" just to stir up trouble by making Fair Grove patrons think that the people of the old Hickory Barren district were trying to take over the Fair Grove School Board. She said this was most definitely not the case.

Fair Grove superintendent Wensey Marsh went to the county superintendent, Paul Alan Hale, to try to get the names of the women removed from the ballot, but Hale said he couldn't do it even if he wanted to because it was too late. 

The dispute resolved itself when the top six vote-getters in the election, held in early July, were all men. When the 1954-55 school year started a month or so later, the former Hickory Barren kids came to Fair Grove. I was in third grade at the time.

Consolidation of Ash Grove and Bois D'Arc

I've mentioned the school consolidation movement of the 20th century on this blog two or three times in the past. In Missouri at least, the movement started in the early part of the century, picked up steam during the middle part of the century, and then tailed off near the end of the century. In the 1800s and very early 1900s, public educators sought to provide a school within walking distance of every child in the rural sections of the state. However, as roads and methods of transportation improved, the emphasis changed from locating schools close to every child to finding the best way to provide a quality education to the most students in the most efficient and economic fashion possible. 

School consolidation was more or less a two-pronged movement: 1) incorporating small, rural, elementary schools into nearby K-12 school districts and 2) combining two or more k-12 school districts into one. One instance of two K-12 districts going together to form a single school district that I remember was the Ash Grove-Bois D'Arc consolidation in Greene County during the late 1950s. I was not personally affected by it, but I remember when it happened because I went to Fair Grove Schools, and all three schools (Fair Grove, Ash Grove, and Bois D'Arc) were members of the Greene County League when it came to sports competition. I was in grade school at the time, but I recall that, during my early elementary years, we used to play Bois D'Arc in basketball and then, all of a sudden, we didn't, because there was no longer a Bois D'Arc High School.      

Consolidation of Bois D'Arc and Ash Grove was first proposed in the fall of 1956, but it was another year before the school boards from the two districts and the Greene County School Board all got together to seriously discuss such a consolidation. The county school board was pushing for the consolidation, because its members, including the county superintendent, thought combining the two school would provide for a better education for a larger number of students. An example cited was the fact that Ash Grove Schools, with an enrollment of 424, had a band and offered agriculture classes while Bois D'Arc, with only 225 students in grades 1-12, did not. Putting the two schools together would give kids from Bois D'Arc an opportunity to participate in those activities as well. 

In mid-December 1957, the school boards from Ash Grove and Bois D'Arc met in a joint session and agreed to move forward with consolidation. Plans called for an elementary school to be retained in Bois D'Arc while all high school students would go to Ash Grove. It was also mentioned that a few students from the two districts might end up going to either Willard or Republic because the school district boundaries would likely be redrawn to make them more uniform. If the consolidation plan was approved, election of a new, six-member school board for the consolidated district would be held immediately. The county superintendent announced that the consolidated district would probably not be called either Ash Grove or Bois D'Arc. 

That, however, turned out not to be the case. The proposal for consolidation was presented to voters in March of 1958, and it was overwhelmingly approved by patrons of both school districts, although the ratio of "yes" to "no" votes was understandably somewhat greater among Ash Grove voters than among Bois D'Arc voters, since Ash Grove patrons were not in line to lose their high school. Where school consolidations are concerned, however, this particular one came off with relatively little dissent or dispute, even after it was learned that the high school would still be called Ash Grove rather than being assigned a new name. 

An interesting footnote to this story is that, when school started in the fall of 1958, the Ash Grove High School basketball coach learned that he had eight players returning who had been varsity starters the previous year. Despite this fact, the coach said he anticipated only an average season.

Mysterious Disappearance of Sadie Nave

On May 3, 1893, twenty-year-old Sadie Nave arose early, "arrayed herself in her best clothes," and told the woman she was boarding with in Springfield (MO) that she was going out to "seek a situation." She left her trunk, wardrobe, and other belongings at the woman's house, but she never came back.

It was almost two weeks later before the Springfield Leader got wind of the girl's disappearance and reported on the story. It was feared Sadie had either been abducted or had committed suicide, said the Leader. "She was rendered desperate on account of the seductive wiles of a man who has promised to marry her and then refused to do so after he accomplished her ruin." It was the "old, old story of loving not wisely but too well," and, according to the newspaper, it had left her despondent and friendless. 

Sadie had left her home in Douglas County in late 1892 and went to Seymour, where she worked at the Castor Hotel for about five weeks before coming to Springfield in early 1893. She had stayed with and worked for a number of different families since her arrival in Springfield. 

The name of the young man who'd deserted Sadie was Will Hampton, and it turned out that he had been previously married and had never gotten a divorce. The husband of one of the women Sadie had stayed with consulted an attorney about suing Will Hampton for breach of promise, but the attorney advised the man that he should contact Sadie's father in Douglas County, because he was the proper person to bring such a suit. 

A Leader reporter called on one of the women with whom Sadie had stayed, and the woman told him that Sadie had often threatened suicide and had tried in vain to purchase morphine and laudanum. "She cried nearly all the time she was with me," the woman said, because Will Hampton had "gone back on her." At one point a month or so earlier, Hampton had promised to meet Sadie at the woman's house and "make it all right with the girl," but he never showed up. Sadie told the woman she'd rather die than face the shame of returning home to Douglas County. 

The newspaperman thought Sadie had most likely carried through with her repeated threats to kill herself, but whether that is the case, I have not been able to learn. The lack of any follow-up stories to that effect suggests that maybe she did not commit suicide. Or at least that no body was ever found. 

I mentioned several weeks ago that newspapers in the late 1800s and early 1900s often made headline stories out of incidents that nowadays would scarcely warrant a mention. The story of Sadie Nave seems to fall into that category. Nowadays, such a sad, personal story would probably be considered by most legitimate newspapers to be nobody else's business. Only in the gossip sheets would you likely find a story like this one.